Should free speech be allowed no matter what harm it may be causing to others?
This is something that must be judged case by case. I think that accepting free speech indefinitately without examining the potential costs is irresponsible.
For instance should Evangelical Christians be allowed to express their beliefs to young vulnerable children who may take the visions of hell all too seriously and subscribe to a faith through fear alone?
This would surely strengthen fundamentalism and anti-intellectualism in America and Europe, which is the last thing that this world needs.
What sparked this discussion was this article from the Wisconsin State Journal concerning Fred Phelps and Westboro’s recent demonstrations outside funerals.
The author came to the conclusion that Phelps was well within his rights to protest in such a way, which I do agree with but it made me think - at what point does it all become too much?
Should bereaved families be forced to grin and bear the unequivical hate targetted towards their loved one?
Thankfully this issue seems to be, being addressed in a number of states who are placing restrictions on when and where the protestors can demonstrate. However this on its own will not be enough to stop people from being hurt.
Education will go along way to easing this and similiar problems.
By teaching people about fundamentalism and its causes I’m sure over time people will become less reactionary and more understanding of the desperation behind people like Phelp’s beliefs.
We can but hope that as time passes people will rise above it and show compassion rather than bile to groups such as this.